http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?...
Row over BBC drama which shows Jesus crucified in a foetal position
By PAUL REVOIR - More by this author » Last updated at 11:58am on 17th March 2008
The BBC is facing accusations of rewriting the Easter story by claiming Christ was nailed to the cross in a foetal position.
The corporation is accused of "misleading" the public by ditching the traditional image of Jesus with arms outstretched, legs straight and hands nailed.
Makers of lavish new drama The Passion, which started last night, say they are challenging this image, because new historical evidence shows he probably did not die this way.
They instead maintain he likely died with his arms above his head, nails through his arms and his knees bent, when killed by the Romans.
But the corporation is being accused of ignoring evidence in the Bible and gratuitously offending Christians who cherish the image.
This comes just weeks after the broadcaster faced claims of exonerating Judas and Pontius Pilate in the same programme, which stars Joseph Mawle as Jesus.
Others have also hit out at the programme's portrayal of Jesus' mother Mary, after the programme suggested she had not known what was happening to her.
Speaking about the crucifixion row, Reverend George Curry, chairman of the Church Society, said: "They are misleading people by distorting the facts.
"That's a serious and dangerous thing to do, but sadly utterly predictable and regrettable. Jesus's nails went through his hands not his forearms.
"We should be true to history and the events that occurred."
Other scholars pointed out that the traditional image was important to Christians in understanding the event.
They also claimed it ignored what the Bible says and the image of Jesus "throwing his arms out in a symbol of love".
In the Book of John, Jesus says to Thomas: "Put your finger here; see my hands."
But production designer, Simon Elliott, defended the crucifixion scene, claiming they were trying to make the show as "historically accurate" as possible.
He said: "The Victorian image of Jesus doesn't tie in with the historical evidence.
"He was probably put on a crude wooden gibbet and made to stand in a loose, foetal position. It was fiendishly designed."
Elliott claimed that the position so well known to Christians was only one of a number of ways the Romans crucified people.
He added: "It is a minefield as everyone has such strong feelings about it."
But the decision to go with the new portrayal was based on "lengthy research", including the discovery of a crucified skeleton found near Jerusalem in 1968.
It is believed that in the foetal type position would have meant that his chest was crushed and he would have died of asphyxiation.
Mark Goodacre, associate professor of religion at Duke University, who advised producers, also defended the scene.
He claimed the Bible did not explain in any detail the type of crucifixion that was used.
The academic added: "The makers wanted something that wasn't the typical image that would surprise the viewers. This is not an attempt to be iconoclastic, but to get people to look again at the events surrounding his death."
The BBC has faced claims of trying to exonerate Judas, Pontius Pilate and High Priest Caiaphas in the programme.
Programme-makers have portrayed them in a sympathetic manner, claiming they have been dealt "a raw deal" by history.
Judas Iscariot is portrayed as torn between his loyalties to two fathers, Caiaphas and Jesus.
Pilate is shown struggling to manage his wife's social aspirations and his career as he tried to "keep a lid" on tensions in Jerusalem.
Stephen Green, national director of Christian Voice, said: "Yet again a revisionist slant has to be put on a story that is transparent.
"It's fine to have an alternative look at the motivation of people such as Caiaphas, Pilate and Judas, but the fact remains that these guys were instrumental in an innocent man meeting his death."
The Passion also stars James Nesbitt as Pilate, Ben Daniels as Caiaphas and ex-EastEnders actor Paul Nicholls as Judas.
The four-part BBC1 drama, which climaxes on Easter Sunday, will also feature Penelope Wilton as an "angrier" Mary.
Pilgrim
I'm first, so that means everyone agrees with me... yesss!
I dunno, this strikes me as being inflammatory for the purpose of being inflammatory.
1I agree Cabaker. It seems to me that they just want the attention, and what better way then to piss some Christians off. Then it makes it seem, once again, that Christians are close minded, tyrants that don't want to face facts.
As a Catholic, it does not bother me that they changed the way he was crucified, as it does not change the foundation of my beliefs, he was crucified, died, was burried and on the third day rose. Just changed the manner of which he died. It does bother me however, that I don't believe that they change the crucifiction to be be accurate, but more for ratings and controversy.
Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.
2"It does bother me however, that I don't believe that they change the crucifiction to be be accurate, but more for ratings and controversy." - I kind of got that feeling myself.
What's funny is that I am kind of indifferent on the topic, but I( didn't put that as a choice in the poll. I didn't realize that should have been a choice until after I posted this, had to vote and thought: "Why isn't there a choice for those who are indifferent on the matter? Idiots! Who writes these things anyway?"
3It does bother me, but I guess everyone is entitled to their own interpretation. All that matters to me is that they spread the Good News. If there is controversy then people will watch, and when people watch, the seed of the Good News about Christ's death, and resurrection is being planted. That is all that matters to me. I will keep believing in how the Bible describes His Crucifixion.
4Well, lets’ get all Christians throughout the world to declare jihad on the BBC, call for the death of all who participated, demand an apology from the BBC, the British Government, and the queen. Maybe find English flag or two to burn. Who knows maybe Christians will get an apology from all of EU, and some “sensitivity” training for all news media.
One thing I know for darn sure, it works.
5grandpa - hahahah!!
that would be the day!
6Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.
7
best idea ever grandpa.
8Grandpa, Good point!
You sound like my husband.
Cine, I totally agree with you..on both of your comments.
Cabaker, You took the words out of my mouth.."That would be the day!".
9That is awesome!
Great job Grandpa!
10Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.