Sunday, Sep. 21, 2008
How We Became the United States of France
By Bill Saporito
This is the state of our great republic: We've nationalized the financial system, taking control from Wall Street bankers we no longer trust. We're about to quasi-nationalize the Detroit auto companies via massive loans because they're a source of American pride, and too many jobs β and votes β are at stake. Our Social Security system is going broke as we head for a future in which too many retirees will be supported by too few workers. How long before we have national health care? Put it all together, and the America that emerges is a cartoonish version of the country most despised by red-meat red-state patriots: France. Only with worse food.
Admit it, mes amis, the rugged individualism and cutthroat capitalism that made America the land of unlimited opportunity has been shrink-wrapped by half a dozen short sellers in Greenwich, Conn., and FedExed to Washington, D.C., to be spoon-fed back to life by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson. We're now no different from any of those Western European semi-socialist welfare states that we love to deride. Italy? Sure, it's had four governments since last Thursday, but none of them would have allowed this to go on; the Italians know how to rig an economy.
You just know the Frogs have only increased their disdain for us, if that is indeed possible. And why shouldn't they? The average American is working two and a half jobs, gets two weeks off and has all the employment security of a one-armed trapeze artist. The Bush Administration has preached the "ownership society" to America: own your house, own your retirement account; you don't need the government in your way. So Americans mortgaged themselves to the hilt to buy overpriced houses they can no longer afford and signed up for 401(k) programs that put money β where, exactly? In the stock market! Where rich Republicans fleeced them.
Now our laissez-faire (hey, a French phrase), regulation-averse Administration has made France's famed Socialist President, FranΓ§ois Mitterrand, look like Adam Smith by comparison. All Mitterrand did was nationalize France's big banks and insurance companies in 1982; he didn't have to deal with bankers who didn't want to lend money, as Paulson does. When the state runs the banks, they are merely cows to be milked in the service of la patrie. France doesn't have the mortgage crisis that we do, either. In bailing out mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, our government has basically turned America into the largest subsidized housing project in the world. Sure, France has its banlieues, where it likes to warehouse people who aren't French enough (meaning, immigrants and Algerians) in huge apartment blocks. But the bulk of French homeowners are curiously free of subprime mortgages foisted on them by fellow citizens, and they aren't over their heads in personal debt.
We've always dismissed the French as exquisitely fed wards of their welfare state. They work, what, 27 hours in a good week, have 19 holidays a month, go on strike for two days and enjoy a glass of wine every day with lunch β except for the 25% of the population working for the government, who have an even sweeter deal. They retire before their kids finish high school, and they don't have to save for $45,000-a-year college tuition, because college is free. For this, they pay a tax rate of about 103%, and their labor laws are so restrictive that they haven't had a net gain in jobs since Napoleon. There is no way the French government can pay for this lifestyle forever, except that it somehow does.
Mitterrand tried to create both job growth and wage growth by nationalizing some big industries β as France had done with automaker Renault earlier. The successful automaker became a private company again in 1996, although the government retains about 15% of its shares.
Now the U.S. is faced with the same prospect in the auto industry. GM and Ford need money to develop greener cars that can compete with Toyota and Honda. And they're looking to Uncle Sam for investment β an investment that could have been avoided had Washington imposed more stringent mileage standards years earlier. But we don't want to interfere with market forces like the French do β until we do.
Mitterrand's nationalization program and other economic reforms failed, as the development of the European Market made a centrally planned economy obsolete. The Rothschilds got their bank back, a little worse for the wear. These days, France sashays around the issue of protectionism in a supposedly unfettered EU by proclaiming some industries to be national champions worthy of extra consideration β you know, special-needs kids. And we're not talking about pastry chefs, but the likes of GDF Suez, a major utility. I never thought of the stocks and junk securities sold by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley as unique, but clearly Washington does. Morgan's John Mack calls SEC boss Chris Cox to whine about short sellers, and bingo, the government obliges. The elite serve the elite. How French is that?
Even in the strongest sectors in the U.S., there's no getting away from the French influence. Nothing is more sacred to France than its farmers. They get whatever they demand, and they demand a lot. And if there are any issues about price supports, or feed costs being too high, or actual competition from other countries, French farmers simply shut down the country by marching their livestock up the Champs Elyses and piling up wheat on the highways. U.S. farmers would never resort to such behavior. They don't have to; they're the most coddled special-interest group in U.S. history, lavished with $180 billion in subsidies by both parties, even when their products are fetching record prices. One consequence: U.S. consumers pay twice what the French pay for sugar, because of price guarantees. We're more French than France.
So yes, while we're still willing to work ourselves to death for the privilege of paying off our usurious credit cards, we can no longer look contemptuously at the land of 246 cheeses. Kraft Foods has replaced American International Group in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the insurance company having been added to Paulson's nationalized portfolio. Macaroni and cheese has supplanted credit-default swaps at the fulcrum of capitalism. And one more thing: the food-snob French love McDonalds, which does a fantastic business there. They know a good freedom fry when they taste one.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1843168,00.html?cnn=yes
Rocket Dog
My french client sent me this with the link: Talking about the lazy and stupid, on a more global scale, I think the USA are taking the wring path if I read correctly this article
France is NOT a good example to inspire politics and policies !
***************
1"Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course"
-Shakespeare (King Henry the VI)
He is saying Andorra is a good place to move to.
2***************
"Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course"
-Shakespeare (King Henry the VI)
Sam I never understand when people say "Look at France" like their politics are a good thing.
Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.
3Well, it makes you think.
4But...France isn't the only welfare state (I'm using welfare in the definitive meaning:Health, happiness, and good fortune; well-being.). Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Germany, etc. while having lower GDP per capita, are ranked vastly higher for standards of living. Being able to work less and spend more time with family, live less stressful lives supported by better health care system, more days off, free education and lower costs of housing and living is a lot to be said.
I personally have issues with France that have more to do with the way they are handling their rising Muslim/N. African population then I do with anything else. Plenty of countries are bad examples of a good system.
I thought the article pointed out that because of circumstance we are moving in the direction of France, but we are doing so in an unplanned disorganized way that will lead to us having a convoluted government and leave us with all of the negative aspects of a more socialist state without any of the benefits. I thought the article was calling us out to start making conscious decisions, either way, with where are country is going.
5One French thing I would like to have is the amount of nuclear power they use for utilities. I'd go for that. Oh and some champagne.
6I agree with your third paragraph, Jessie. It was saying we're becoming socialists but without the excessive vacations and short work weeks.
I personally do have a problem with that, though, because it means my freedom is not really my own anymore. When the government owns everything and is taking all my money or most of it, I imagine I won't have much of an incentive to be an entrepreneur or what have you. It doesn't seem like a great life to me, it seems like a life run by the government. Bleh.
7"Being able to work less and spend more time with family, live less stressful lives supported by better health care system, more days off, free education and lower costs of housing and living is a lot to be said."
I have to disagree with most of this statement. The health care system is not better in Europe, the education is NOT free, and it is NOT lower cost of living by any means, ESPECIALLY France. Europe is notoriously expensive, and in many of their countries there is a huge Social gap with their citizens. Not to mention the HUGE unemployment problem they have in France. They do get more days off, such as maternity leave, but that is the government controlling private enterprise which I do not agree with.
But as red about the nuclear power and champagne though
Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.
8Jessie, I'm actually really interested in what you said: "Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Germany, etc. while having lower GDP per capita, are ranked vastly higher for standards of living."
I just wonder how long this can be sustained.
9Brendel this is conservative sugar and I am a democratic socialist, so I'm going to bow out of arguing political ideology as this doesn't seem like the place
. I just wanted to comment on what I thought was a well thought out argument.
France is expensive to visit as they have a 20% sales tax in order to pay all workers a living wage, but if you actually live there it is different. Though I wasn't specifically referring to France in fact I was referring to Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Germany and Spain. It should be said that the entire EU does not operate the same. The Scandinavian countries are also rated the most peaceful in the world. Now thats something I can get behind.
The main findings of the Global Peace Index are:
* Peace correlated to indicators such as income, schooling and the level of regional integration
* Peaceful countries often shared high levels of transparency of government and low corruption
In France education is extremely competitive with the tracking system starting after middle school, but to those who make it public education is free. College used to be completely free in Germany until it was abused, but it is still heavily subsidized at around 500β¬ a year.
10Well how it works tiff is that the individual brings home less money and most families on average have less recreational money to spend on new cars or bigger houses. On the flip side the minimum wage is higher and combats inflation so that everyone can afford to live. So I guess it is more accurate to say the cost of living is more affordable and not necessarily lower. The trade off being that the individual family doesn't have to use the that income to pay for health or education. Germany has this wonderful family that pays for an extended materninty leave or a paternity leave. They reimburse companies so that women or men get paid around 75% of what they made to stay home. It reduces/takes place the cost of traditionally government subsidized childcare to make it affordable.
I guess it comes down to what you think is more important. While I respect the American dream of becoming rich and have a large disposable income. I tend to think democratic socialism provides more freedom and movement for the entire population than it takes away. It is more important to be to have a higher quality of living as a whole as that generally abstracts to mean less crime and violence for everyone and you can't buy that.
11It has to be planned and handles properly to be sustained...thats for sure, but as you can see from our current situation that applies to most forms of government. Being able to look into the future and delay immediate gratification is essential to government planning.
12Unfortunately in France although they have a competitive educational system after they graduate the students don't have jobs to obtain.
And using the word FREE is very misleading, because NOTHING is free. They pay for it, they just pay for through taxes instead of on an individual basis. Back to our ideological differences, I do not feel that others should have to pay for my decision on to go to school.
Anyway, Jess thank you for taking the time to respond. I truly enjoyed reading your comments. I found them very interesting and well written. I appreciate your insight.
Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.
13Thank you Jess, for your comments and insight. I do appreciate it, too, especially given that you didn't take a derogatory tone with your post as often seems to happen when there are differing opinions.
14any one know what the current unemployment rate is in "france"?
15last I heard double digits and it is near impossible to fire anyone there.
16***************
"Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course"
-Shakespeare (King Henry the VI)
8% last year
Thank you Jessie! I really appreciate your comments as well.
17googled it - Tiff is correct
18***************
"Let me embrace thee, sour adversity, for wise men say it is the wisest course"
-Shakespeare (King Henry the VI)
THe problem Pam is in France once you are employed it is nearly impossible to fire someone. So there is no turnover rate, so there are very few new jobs.
Absolute power, corrupts absolutely.
19I thought it was high.
20Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.