Earth on the Brink of an Ice Age (An article from today’s Pravda)
The earth is now on the brink of entering another Ice Age, according to a large and compelling body of evidence from within the field of climate science. Many sources of data which provide our knowledge base of long-term climate change indicate that the warm, twelve thousand year-long Holocene period will rather soon be coming to an end, and then the earth will return to Ice Age conditions for the next 100,000 years.
Ice cores, ocean sediment cores, the geologic record, and studies of ancient plant and animal populations all demonstrate a regular cyclic pattern of Ice Age glacial maximums which each last about 100,000 years, separated by intervening warm interglacials, each lasting about 12,000 years.
Most of the long-term climate data collected from various sources also shows a strong correlation with the three astronomical cycles which are together known as the Milankovich cycles. The three Milankovich cycles include the tilt of the earth, which varies over a 41,000 year period; the shape of the earth’s orbit, which changes over a period of 100,000 years; and the Precession of the Equinoxes, also known as the earth’s ‘wobble’, which gradually rotates the direction of the earth’s axis over a period of 26,000 years. According to the Milankovich theory of Ice Age causation, these three astronomical cycles, each of which effects the amount of solar radiation which reaches the earth, act together to produce the cycle of cold Ice Age maximums and warm interglacials.
Elements of the astronomical theory of Ice Age causation were first presented by the French mathematician Joseph Adhemar in 1842, it was developed further by the English prodigy Joseph Croll in 1875, and the theory was established in its present form by the Czech mathematician Milutin Milankovich in the 1920s and 30s. In 1976 the prestigious journal “Science” published a landmark paper by John Imbrie, James Hays, and Nicholas Shackleton entitled “Variations in the Earth's orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages,” which described the correlation which the trio of scientist/authors had found between the climate data obtained from ocean sediment cores and the patterns of the astronomical Milankovich cycles. Since the late 1970s, the Milankovich theory has remained the predominant theory to account for Ice Age causation among climate scientists, and hence the Milankovich theory is always described in textbooks of climatology and in encyclopaedia
In their 1976 paper Imbrie, Hays, and Shackleton wrote that their own climate forecasts, which were based on sea-sediment cores and the Milankovich cycles, "… must be qualified in two ways. First, they apply only to the natural component of future climatic trends - and not to anthropogenic effects such as those due to the burning of fossil fuels. Second, they describe only the long-term trends, because they are linked to orbital variations with periods of 20,000 years and longer. Climatic oscillations at higher frequencies are not predicted... the results indicate that the long-term trend over the next 20,000 years is towards extensive Northern Hemisphere glaciation and cooler climate."
During the 1970s the famous American astronomer Carl Sagan and other scientists began promoting the theory that ‘greenhouse gasses’ such as carbon dioxide, or CO2, produced by human industries could lead to catastrophic global warming. Since the 1970s the theory of ‘anthropogenic global warming’ (AGW) has gradually become accepted as fact by most of the academic establishment, and their acceptance of AGW has inspired a global movement to encourage governments to make pivotal changes to prevent the worsening of AGW.
The central piece of evidence that is cited in support of the AGW theory is the famous ‘hockey stick’ graph which was presented by Al Gore in his 2006 film “An Inconvenient Truth.” The ‘hockey stick’ graph shows an acute upward spike in global temperatures which began during the 1970s and continued through the winter of 2006/07. However, this warming trend was interrupted when the winter of 2007/8 delivered the deepest snow cover to the Northern Hemisphere since 1966 and the coldest temperatures since 2001. It now appears that the current Northern Hemisphere winter of 2008/09 will probably equal or surpass the winter of 2007/08 for both snow depth and cold temperatures.
The main flaw in the AGW theory is that its proponents focus on evidence from only the past one thousand years at most, while ignoring the evidence from the past million years -- evidence which is essential for a true understanding of climatology. The data from paleoclimatology provides us with an alternative and more credible explanation for the recent global temperature spike, based on the natural cycle of Ice Age maximums and interglacials.
In 1999 the British journal “Nature” published the results of data derived from glacial ice cores collected at the Russia ’s Vostok station in Antarctica during the 1990s. The Vostok ice core data includes a record of global atmospheric temperatures, atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and airborne particulates starting from 420,000 years ago and continuing through history up to our present time.
The graph of the Vostok ice core data shows that the Ice Age maximums and the warm interglacials occur within a regular cyclic pattern, the graph-line of which is similar to the rhythm of a heartbeat on an electrocardiogram tracing. The Vostok data graph also shows that changes in global CO2 levels lag behind global temperature changes by about eight hundred years. What that indicates is that global temperatures precede or cause global CO2 changes, and not the reverse. In other words, increasing atmospheric CO2 is not causing global temperature to rise; instead the natural cyclic increase in global temperature is causing global CO2 to rise.
The reason that global CO2 levels rise and fall in response to the global temperature is because cold water is capable of retaining more CO2 than warm water. That is why carbonated beverages loose their carbonation, or CO2, when stored in a warm environment. We store our carbonated soft drinks, wine, and beer in a cool place to prevent them from loosing their ‘fizz’, which is a feature of their carbonation, or CO2 content. The earth is currently warming as a result of the natural Ice Age cycle, and as the oceans get warmer, they release increasing amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere.
Because the release of CO2 by the warming oceans lags behind the changes in the earth’s temperature, we should expect to see global CO2 levels continue to rise for another eight hundred years after the end of the earth’s current Interglacial warm period. We should already be eight hundred years into the coming Ice Age before global CO2 levels begin to drop in response to the increased chilling of the world’s oceans.
The Vostok ice core data graph reveals that global CO2 levels regularly rose and fell in a direct response to the natural cycle of Ice Age minimums and maximums during the past four hundred and twenty thousand years. Within that natural cycle, about every 110,000 years global temperatures, followed by global CO2 levels, have peaked at approximately the same levels which they are at today.
About 325,000 years ago, at the peak of a warm interglacial, global temperature and CO2 levels were higher than they are today. Today we are again at the peak, and near to the end, of a warm interglacial, and the earth is now due to enter the next Ice Age. If we are lucky, we may have a few years to prepare for it. The Ice Age will return, as it always has, in its regular and natural cycle, with or without any influence from the effects of AGW.
The AGW theory is based on data that is drawn from a ridiculously narrow span of time and it demonstrates a wanton disregard for the ‘big picture’ of long-term climate change. The data from paleoclimatology, including ice cores, sea sediments, geology, paleobotany and zoology, indicate that we are on the verge of entering another Ice Age, and the data also shows that severe and lasting climate change can occur within only a few years. While concern over the dubious threat of Anthropogenic Global Warming continues to distract the attention of people throughout the world, the very real threat of the approaching and inevitable Ice Age, which will render large parts of the Northern Hemisphere uninhabitable, is being foolishly ignored.
Cyberjammies
Thanks GP. I have been hearing about this......Interesting
1I read that 1990 study, back when it was first published, and the original Russian paper it was based on. Those of you who know me, these papers were the basis for considering man made global warming hokum. The really really scary thing is those same politicians around the world who rant and rave about mankind having to change it's ways or the planet is doomed (think Kyoto), those same politicians that were responsible for the current world wide credit crunch, those same politicians that sat and watched the housing market spiral out of control (think freddy and fanny mac), are now going to be making decisions on how to bring our economy back, all with the same arrogant certitude they exhibited in the past. This is not a partisan attack by the way, so lets not have debates as to who was most at fault. Just ponder the wisdom of our political class, and stop being placard carrying ideologies. Open your minds for Gods sake.
2Is there anywhere that would tell us what the temps would drop to? Dallas has fairly decent weather, but I'm wondering what it and other cities average temps would change to.
~~~~~
It is necessary to try to surpass oneself always; this occupation ought to last as long as life.
3thanks for the post Grandpa. I just read an article this morning about this.
4In the last ice age, the top 1/3 of the US, Long island New york was formed by the retreating glaciers remember, Moscow, the British isles where all under Glaciers
5I think we are seeing the natural cycles of this young planet. We are having a winter here in NY like we did when I was a kid but the summer was wetter then I ever remember.
6***************
"Enjoy life, it's ungrateful not to." - Ronald Reagan
GP - Do you ever blog anything on here that isn't less than 10,000 words?
This was a great read. It's nice to know that there are scientists out there who aren't suffering from AlGoritis.
7AlGoritis - a condition which causes the infected person/s to believe anything and everything about Global warming and never take into consideration all the facts. Symptoms include: whining about global warming when it rains, snows, sleets, is a sunny day, is a cloudy day, there's a hurricane, tornado, or any other weather-based phenomenon. You may also suffer from AlGoritis if you notice you are suddenly angry and bitter towards any and all non-warming believers. Please consult a doctor if you see an increase in kool-aid consumption.
~~~~~
It is necessary to try to surpass oneself always; this occupation ought to last as long as life.
8Brooke -
9***************
"Enjoy life, it's ungrateful not to." - Ronald Reagan
~~~~~
It is necessary to try to surpass oneself always; this occupation ought to last as long as life.
10Grandpa - Were you spying on me today? My husband had printed this and left it on the kitchen counter for me to read this morning.
11Or are you really my husband in disguise?
12We've got lots of people looking in on you Trixie. Doesn't it feel nice to know you're getting soooo much attention?
13The Great Lakes were carved out during the last Ice Age, and the rolling hills of Southern Indiana are the remains of sediment pushed there by the glaciers. That's also why most of Indiana is so flat: nature's bulldozer!
14I always thought northern IN was flat because of all the overfarming going on there.
(I kid, I kid...)
15Dave - Good to know. Then I won't think I'm going nutty when it feels like someone is watching me.
16"I always thought northern IN was flat because of all the overfarming going on there."
No, it's the weight of all the steel mills and related trucking that used to go on in the NW Indiana. That's my home turf. The farming is further south; the Amish are further east.
17Ick... Northern, as in Merriville, or northern as in South Bend?
18Dave, I try to post facts as opposed to "trust me statements". Most times to provide the full case it takes more then a brief blurb. I know education is a PITA at times, isn't it?
19Well if we want to warm up the planet all we have to do is google something. It will now be known as Google Warming.
20http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7823387.stm
***************
"Enjoy life, it's ungrateful not to." - Ronald Reagan
"I know education is a PITA at times, isn't it"
I wouldn't know, especially if you ask my favorite debate partner on CS.
21Undave, I agree with you.
What ever happened to that very popular publication called "Readers Digest"
22Ick... Northern, as in Merriville, or northern as in South Bend?
Make that double-ick.
23Northern as in the Chesterton / Valparaiso area.
Back in my day, downwind from the Gary steel mills and the Jackson clan.
Cool! Valpo is a great school.
24The chapel at V. U. is beautiful, that's for sure.
25www.valpo.edu/chapel/
Dear Grandpa,
Thanks for sharing this information with all the people we love. You are my favorite Grandpa, and I know I'm not supposed to have favorites. Do you have any thoughts about what we need to do to prepare ourselves for this ice age? I am hoping you'd help us out here and point us in a direction.
Love ya,
Cheekyredhead
(a favorite grandchild)
26Cheeky, the first thing to do is dress warm, and in layers. If the glaciers start moving into your area, move south. Really, there is not a whole lot you can do about global climate change, controlling the activities of the sun, the position of the earth in relation to the sun, are far beyond mortal capabilities.
(oh and one can not have too many grandparents, or grandchildren.)
27May I tell my husband that my Grandpa suggested that I go shopping for warmer clothes?
All kidding aside, I see this transformation occurring rapidly yet not so fast that we cannot do what is necessary to survive. Am I wrong in this assumption?
To a degree, we are guessing with an actual timeline, however I know that technology will offer us the ability to prepare because we will be more aware of changes on the horizon. Of course there will always be those that over prepare and those that expect others to prepare for them.
Do you think that our leaders will step in and let us know what we need to do or will they bury their heads in the dirt and hope it just won't happen while they are in office?
I have been in Southern California since 1976 and have witnessed a great change in not only weather but also our smog situation. In 1976 the smog was horrific...we almost went back to Texas...but who does THAT? The smog situation does SEEM better now.
Here in the OC our rain or moisture every year has been declining and today it is unseasonably warm and DRY for January. We have periods of drought and dryness which has affected our plants and natural animals to our area. Overdevelopment has added to the problem.
At this time of year it is usually an hour drive to Big Bear Mountain, driving from a beautiful seaside beach then up to the snow. Our snowfall has been very disappointing. The water level in the Big Bear Lake has fallen so low that in the summer you see what used to be boat docks, setting very lonely out in the sticks.
I read an article last year in which someone stated that the previous fears of a large quake breaking the Big Bear Dam, resulting in massive floods, is no longer an issue. That demonstrates the dramatic change in the water level.
Water reclamation is something we should all look at here in California. When I think about a new ice age on the horizon, I remind myself that those icebergs could contain all sorts of damaging material unseen by the naked eye. Those who are naive think, “Oh we need water so let’s melt some snow or ice”...they aren't going to think about impurities.
My husband and I dive often in many ocean areas. We see firsthand the damage of red tide which occurs after every rain. The coast in the Gulf of Mexico may never recover. Because these are things that the average person on the street does not see, they do not recognize how it effects them, indirectly now-- but directly soon. If the sea dies, the human race will follow.
Seeing how our “mighty glaciers” in Glacier Park are almost non-existent…one really starts to wonder what is next. It is interesting to me how many people just do not believe it will happen to them or in their live time. Humans tend to be so self-absorbed that they do not know what hit them and then react as a child might and look to blame others for their own resistance to change.
28cheeky, I'm just north of you, and I wore sandals and short sleeves to work today.
The radio this morning referred to the weather as "July in January".
I have wondered for years why our coastal states, especially California, don't have desalination plants. Just more evidence of how short-sighted we have become.
29cheeky, a very brief description. If we look at the contemporary records from the medieval warming period (800-1300 AD), we know it was a time when the human population exploded, and there was a plentiful supply pasture, allowing for an abundance of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, etc. The growing season allowed for two crops/ year to be planted and harvested. When the little ice age began, it was devastating, the growing season shrunk so much that some crops could not be planted and harvested at all. Due to the lack of forage, farm animals could not be sustained anything like in the warming period, after those excess animals had been slaughtered and eaten, endemic malnutrition took place. There is a firm belief that this chronic malnutrition lowered our resistance to disease, and resulted in the mass die off during the black plague. Right now our “Great Plains” is considered the breadbasket of the world. Once Canada and the northern part of the US, growing season shrinks to the point grain can not be harvested, starvation around the world is inevitable. As you point out there is already a dearth in the supply of potable water world wide, that too can only be exacerbated by a little ice age, as more ice means less spring run off. How long this process will take place is an open question, if it is slow enough, there can be gradual adjustments, if it is precipitous, and the sight will not be pretty. What will be devastating would be a major volcanic eruption anywhere in the world, something along the line of Mt. St. Helens eruption would further lower the world’s temperature and its effects more long term then the last eruption. More snow and less melting will reflect the suns heat back into space, so it there will be less melting, and a growing distribution of snow and ice (think glaciers by this point). So, let’s hope that the global warming hysterics are right, global warming would be a net plus for the human race, less ice means more water, longer growing seasons means more crops, and warmer temperatures mean more of Canada, and Siberia would support grain crops.
30Thanks for making plain for those of us (like me) that have a hard time putting virtual time in real time. We are so lucky to have such a marvelous Grandpa!
31Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.