Dick Cheney: The Most Pro-Gay Vice President in History
January 20, 2009 - by B. Daniel Blatt
Were Dick Cheney not a Republican and not, in the eyes of the left, the most reviled member of the most reviled administration in history, he would leave office with gay leaders and advocates singing his praises. For Dick Cheney leaves office today as the most pro-gay vice president in the history of our country.
Known as a vice president very loyal to the president, Cheney almost never disagreed with George W. Bush since Bush tapped the former defense secretary as his running mate in July 2000. On gay issues, however, Cheney frequently made public statements that went beyond the president’s official policies and, at least once, directly opposed them.
He first distinguished himself from Bush on October 5, 2000, in the vice presidential debate. While Bush had not taken a public position on state recognition of same-sex unions, his record in Texas indicated that he was not in favor.
When debate moderator Bernard Shaw asked, “Should a male who loves a male and a female who loves a female have all — all the constitutional rights enjoyed by every American citizen,” one might thus have expected Bush’s running mate to offer an equivocal response. But Cheney did not mince words:
We live in a free society, and freedom means freedom for everybody. We shouldn’t be able to choose and say you get to live free and you don’t. That means people should be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to enter into. It’s no one’s business in terms of regulating behavior in that regard. The next step then, of course, is the question you ask of whether or not there ought to be some kind of official sanction of the relationships or if they should be treated the same as a traditional marriage. … I think different states are likely to come to different conclusions, and that’s appropriate. … We ought to do everything we can to tolerate and accommodate whatever kind of relationships people want to enter into.
In this debate, he didn’t take issue with something his running mate had said or even suggested. Instead, he offered an opinion that some social conservatives, part of the president’s base, might find offensive.
Once elected, however, he would take issue with a public stand Bush had taken on a gay issue. It would be the first — and only time — he would publicly disagree with his running mate in their first term in office. Asked during the 2004 campaign what he thought about “homosexual marriages,” Cheney spoke openly about his gay daughter, saying how “blessed” he was with her and her sister: “They’re both fine young women.” At the same time, he made clear that he opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA), which would have amended the constitution to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. President Bush had announced his support for the amendment earlier in the year.
It wasn’t just his policies. His actions, especially his treatment of his gay daughter Mary, helped define him as the most pro-gay vice president in American history.
In her book, Now It’s My Turn, Mary recounts how her father reacted when she first came out to him: “The first words out of his mouth were exactly the ones I wanted to hear: ‘You’re my daughter and I love you and I just want you to be happy.’”
Later, he would welcome Mary’s partner Heather into their family. They sat together at President Bush’s first inauguration in 2001, his second in 2005, and even today at President Obama’s swearing-in. Heather joined Mary on the stage with the families of the president and vice president when Bush declared victory in 2004. The two women sat together at the White House dinner for Britain’s Prince Charles and his wife Camilla.
In short, in settings both public as well as private, the conservative vice president treated his younger daughter’s female partner just as he treated his older daughter’s husband: as a member of the family.
Cheney didn’t just look out for his daughter. He also looked out for other gay people as well.
When one of her friends, a Bush supporter, feared he might be “outed” and lose his job when the then-president announced his support for the FMA, she brought up his concerns with her father who told her to “tell this person that if anyone — I don’t care who it is — if anyone gives him any trouble, he is to come see me and I’ll take care of it.”
That conservative Republican was willing to go to bat for a gay person.
No vice president in history has done so much for gay people as has Dick Cheney. To be sure, Cheney is the first vice president to have an openly gay child. He treats her as gay activists have long wanted parents to treat their gay children — loving them just as they did before they came out, accepting them as they are, and welcoming their same-sex spouses into their families. And it wasn’t just in private where Cheney loved and accepted his daughter.
In public, he was more than just the proud father of a lesbian daughter. He also spoke out on gay issues, even disagreeing with the then-president to express his opposition to a constitutional amendment the his running mate supported.
Yet, when Cheney left office, encomia were not forthcoming from any gay organization. Searches of the websites of the leading gay organizations (e.g.,Human Rights Campaign, The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, National Center for Lesbian Rights) reveal no mention of this historic vice presidency.
The leading left-of-center gay bloggers (e.g.,Towleroad, Andrew Sullivan, Pam’s House Blend, Joe.My.God, Queerty) were similarly silent.
It would have been a lot different if he were a Democrat. The would certainly have praised him for treating his lesbian daughter with dignity. But that (R) after his name seems to render a politician immune from praise from gay organizations, activists, and left-wing bloggers. It seems that all too often their first concern is not the well-being of gay people, but the promotion of a liberal agenda and the demonization of Republicans.
If the gay organizations were doing their job, they would acknowledge how much a role model Dick Cheney has been, daring to differ with his running mate on gay issues and treating his gay daughter as we would wish all parents treated such children.
But for some people, alas, politics trumps all.
Cyberjammies
It would be nice to see Cheney become a gay rights activist now that he is out of the White House. And I think this post makes it seem like gay rights activists have ignored Cheney's efforts completely, I disagree. While I don't see anyone commenting on him now as he leaves, when he made his comments against the Federal Marriage Amendment many liberal sites and gay rights groups, including The Human Rights Campaign, supported him enthusiastically.
1It was basically a one days "kudos". It would have been nice to see some recognition of his efforts as he left office. It would have been the "classy" thing to do. After all every perceived mistake was not just "an objection at the time", but an ongoing personal attack on the man as if he had no redeeming qualities whatsoever, and was the devil incarnate.
2Loving and accepting his daughter should be a given no matter what her sexual orientation. So what parents do that every day. He represents a party that does not support civil rights for all people. It is a huge contradiction IMO.
3Sexy, did you read the entire article? Cheney went far beyond "Loving and accepting his daughter", in both private and public actions. I am sorry to say, I think your blind hatred serves you ill in this particular instance
4and it's a little off putting to put everyone in a party in a "don't want civil rights for all" box. Easy, sure. But correct? I fear you don't know much about conservatism if that's your reaction to it.
5Syako I don't mean to sound presumptuous but I am not sure if the way you view conservatism is the same way that Cheney views it? Does that make sense?
6Syako I don't mean to sound presumptuous but I am not sure if the way you view conservatism is the same way that Cheney views it? Does that make sense?
7sexylibrarian can you tell me what "civil rights" the republican party opposed?
8Grandpa, I know that he did speak out against the constitutional amendment but he still was the VP to a party who's major issue is anti-gay rights.
9Not wanting gay couples to have the same legal rights as heterosexual couples.
10And I don't think the repubs major issue is "anti-gay" rights.
I don't just not think it, I know it's not.
11I agree with him with regards to a constitutional amendment. If CALIFORNIA, can not pass prop 5, what chance does a constitutional amendment have of getting support of 3/4 of the states, let alone out of congress. The reason that prop 5 did not pass by the way was not because of republican votes, but because of Democrat votes. is it worth quibbling over the terms "marriage" and "civil union", if they both give couples the exact same legal rights and protections? it took less then 50 years to go from segregated lunch counters to a black man sitting in the White House. I am sure in the next few weeks we will see openly gay men and women in the military.
12One more thing, if I went to Los Vegas, and got married by a JP, it would not matter the gender of my partner, it would be a "civil union", it would also be bigamy BTW. A fair compromise would be that folks would need to by "married" by an ordained priest, minister or rabbi, in a traditional religious ceremony. Everyone else homo or hetero would be considered in a "civil union". I have been around a lot of years, met a lot of couples who were considered "married", I have yet to here one of them explain whether or not it was civil, religious, or just long term partners, until we were already good friends and the topic came up tangently. It is the same kind of boorishness as asking a parent for the date they were married, and the age and birthday of their oldest child.
13I hope you don't see this as ganging up SL, I was just interested in checking the GOP platform and seeing where anti-gay showed up. Obviously that term never appears, but the issue of "values" is number 9 of 9 issues. And then specifically within values, the issue of traditional marriage appears 5th on that list.
I think it's a stretch to say that's the top priority.
14Grandpa,
15You sound like you have a great love for Cheney, just how deep does that go. He shouldn't be put up on a throne for loving his daughter because she is gay, if he is such a great father he should love her just because she is his daughter, I believe a parents love should be unconditional.
I don't think that Grandpa or the article is asking anyone to put Chaney on a throne. It would be nice if the left would acknowledge that he is not entirely evil as he has been portrayed.
****************************************************
16"He that lives upon Hope will die fasting." - Benjamin Franklin
I agree with you Grandpa that the government should call all pairings "civil unions". Then if you want to go further and get "married" in a church, that is up to the couple.
****************************************************
17"He that lives upon Hope will die fasting." - Benjamin Franklin
on the contrary 7showgirl7, I hold Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld largely responsible for the mishandling of the war in Iraq, prior to the surge.
“The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money” –Margaret Thatcher.
18Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.