By Malcolm A. Kline | May 29, 2009
Truly, now more than ever, students cannot let their education end with college graduation, particularly when institutions of higher learning are increasingly sacrificing bodies of knowledge for reams of interpretation. For example, too few graduates get to learn about America's uncanny knack for dismantling its defenses before being forced into world conflicts by enemy attacks and her remarkable resilience in overcoming same.
In an astounding bit of serendipity, the percentage of the federal budget that the federal government devotes to defense was similar before both the Pearl Harbor attack of 1941 and the attacks of September 11, 2001-17 percent. Coincidentally, this is the share of the budget that the Obama Administration wants to bring defense spending back down to.
"When the European war began in earnest on September 1, 1939, with the German invasion of Poland, the U.S. Army ranked seventeenth among armies of the world in size and combat power, just behind Romania," Rick Atkinson, author of The Army at Dawn and The Day of Battle, said earlier this month.
Atkinson, who spoke at a conference organized by the Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI), is at work on the third volume of a trilogy he is writing on World War II. "At the time of Pearl Harbor, in December 1941, only one American division was on a full war footing," Atkinson said at the FPRI event in Wheaton, Illinois. "Some American coastal defense guns had not been test-fired in 20 years, and the Army lacked enough antiaircraft guns to protect even a single American city."
"The senior British military officer in Washington told London that 'American forces are more unready for war than it is possible to imagine,'" Atkinson related. "In May 1940, the month that the German Blitzkrieg swept through the Low Countries and overran France, the U.S. Army owned a total of 464 tanks, mostly puny light tanks with the combat power of a coffee can."
Despite America's achievement in overcoming these seemingly insurmountable obstacles to victory, Atkinson, on leave from an editing job at The Washington Post, takes exception to any notion that America is exceptional. "The U.S. Army did not win World War II by itself," he insists. "We can be proud of our role, proud of our Army; we must not be delusional, chauvinistic, or so besotted with American exceptionalism that we falsify history."
"The war began 27 months before American entry into the war. It was fought on six continents, a global conflagration unlike any seen before or since." Nonetheless, he goes on to lay out the sheer scope of the U. S. effort.
"Germany could not muster the wherewithal to cross the English Channel, which is only 21 miles wide, to invade Britain," he observes. "The United States projected power across the Atlantic, the Mediterranean, and the Pacific and into Southeast Asia and the Indian subcontinent."
"Power-projection, adaptability, versatility, ingenuity, preponderance-these are salient characteristics of the U.S. Army in WWII." On the home front:
"The United States built 3.5 million private cars in 1941; for the rest of the war, we built 139;
"Instead, in 1943 alone, we built 86,000 planes, 45,000 tanks, and 648,000 trucks;
"We made in that one year 61 million pairs of wool socks;
"Every day another 71 million rounds of small-arms ammunition spilled from Army munitions plants."
America won that war and averted a replay of the 9/11 massacres with what amounted to a catch-up defense. As for whatever, as the vice-president might put it, "loin-girding challenges" await this nation, well, as a popular World War II song went, We did it before and we can do it again.
Cyberjammies
I'd say our new President is a major "risk taker" in that I am surprised to learn he wants to bring defense spending back down to"... before Pearl Harbour attack and 9/11 levels.
Maybe he looks at all the many threats coming at the US from every part of the world as bluffs?
1"Maybe he looks at all the many threats coming at the US from every part of the world as bluffs?"
Pam - I wonder that myself. Either that or he believes that the huggy lovin' he's so fond of will neutralize the evil of our enemies.
2huggy lovin'
well it could be Trixie.
I also wonder if Obama actually sees himself looking at America the same way our enemies look at us, with distain and loathing? could that be possible?
3I don't know if he, himself, can see how much disdain he has for this country. His actions and words speak to it but, IMHO, in his warped little mind he's doing the very best for the USA & its citizens.
4It might end up being a hard lesson for him to learn at the cost of American lives and property.
We were made of stronger, more united stuff back in WWII. Now the unions would whine and the welfare babies would wet themselves.
5***************
"I will marshal all the forces of darkness to hound you to an assisted suicide." - In the Loop
Really good post!
6Here is another fascinating fact, the Germans never lost a battle in WWII unless and until it was outnumbered. We never conquered islands like Tarawa and Iwo Jima, until the Japanese defenders for all practical purposes ran out of ammunition> it was our industrial might, our ability to innovate, and the fact we had broken both the Japanese and Germany's most "secure" codes, allowing us to know more about the enemy's plans, far enough in advance to counter them.
7Bah, did it again posted before i could read, edit an complete my thoughts.
While our opponents had supply problems we didn't. We owned the air and sea over both theaters for almost the entire war 6 months after entering the war.
8My husband gets so angry when he reads that the U.S. won WWII (and writes letters/emails to the History Channel when they say that we did)
If it weren't for the Russians, we'd all be speaking German. We played a very small role in
comparison, and lost a fraction of the lives that Stalin threw at the Germans as if Russian lives were disposable.
9Without the U.S., WWII would not have ended in an allied victory, that claim can be attributed to our industrial might, and the aid we sent to England and Russia. Could the allies have defeated the Germans without Russian help, I can't say for sure. What I can say for sure, is that it would have taken years longer, and countless more Western European and American lives, not to mention civillian casuties, particularly German. The original plan for the use of an atomic bomb called for one to be dropped on a German city and another on a Japanese city. What would have happenned is that Germany would be a nation of rubble, with no cities left worth the name.
10Russia took over Berlin.
We may not be speaking German, but we'd be speaking Russian if it weren't for the U.S. and the Western front. I'm not downplaying our role or the role of the Western Front, but to claim that we (the U.S.) won the war is a gross misstatement.
11Russia took over Berlin, because Eisenhower ordered the allies to stop outside Berlin. General patten was livid he was not allowed to go into Berlin. Eisenhower wanted to save American lives. His attitude was why take a city that the Russians are itching to fight and die to capture, if Berlin would fall under Russian control anyway. General Bradley estimated we would suffer an additional 100,000 casualties in taking Berlin, and certainly not worth it just for "prestige value".
12The "official" Russian losses in taking Berlin:81,116 dead or missing[ (including 2,825 Polish)
280,251 sick or wounded
Total casualties 361,367 men
1,997 tanks,
2,108 artillery pieces,
917 aircraft[7]
ok.
13Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.