Public Post
+++++++++++++++
King Barack?
By David Limbaugh
Oh, how quickly times have changed. Just a few short years ago, Democrats were up in arms over King George III's (President George W. Bush's) "unconstitutional" executive power grabs. Where are these people now?
I'll tell you where they are: right in the thick of it, enabling President Barack Obama to consolidate and exercise unprecedented power.
Remember when Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy complained that the constitutional "checks and balances that have served to constrain abuses of power for more than two centuries in this country" were at risk because Republicans controlled the executive and legislative branches? How about Sen. Russ Feingold, who was looking at impeachment as a remedy to keep the president in check and prevent him from acquiring power "like King George III"?
Today these same senators are not just passively mute about Obama's power grabs; they are co-conspirators.
You might think the repeated conservative complaint about Obama's egregious lack of transparency is, by now, a tired talking point. But we're not just referring to minor procedural matters that are substantively inconsequential.
He hasn't just breached his promise to make his legislation available for public preview. He and his congressional cohorts are burying very important matters in legislation.
The Waxman-Markey cap and tax debacle that just slipped through the House was bad enough, with its mandated broad-based assaults on America's taxpayers, energy and economy in exchange for no appreciable expected environmental benefits. But look at its stealth provision, reported by the Washington Examiner, creating a three-year package of unemployment benefits, a $1,500 job relocation allowance and a health insurance premium subsidy for workers unemployed as a result of this "jobs creation" bill. Unbelievable! How can any congressman who voted for this monstrosity possibly get re-elected?
This was nothing new, though, as you'll recall that Obama's non-stimulative stimulus bill increased unemployment benefits for those not magically benefited by that job creations bill.
Indeed, there are so many Obama abuses I can only chronicle a fraction of them in a short column. But just consider a few others, and ask yourself how long even rank-and-file Democrats can justify supporting such tyrannical madness by this arrogant chief executive, who truly is — as distinguished from Bush — engaged in a daily quest to "dictate" fundamental, structural changes to this nation:
- ABC News reported that a senior White House official said the urgency of extending the expiring U.S.-Russia nuclear arms treaty "might mean temporarily bypassing the Senate's constitutional role in ratifying treaties." Did you hear that, Sens. Leahy and Feingold?
- President Obama is appointing so many "czars" to help him run the government without the usual accountability of Cabinet-level positions that even Sen. Robert Byrd said this practice "can threaten the constitutional system of checks and balances." Byrd's worried, but what do Leahy and Feingold think of Obama's pay czar, who'll have broad discretion over executive pay?
- Obama has so insulated himself from ordinary press scrutiny that even liberal journalists Chip Reid and Helen Thomas grilled White House press secretary Robert Gibbs for Obama's "tightly controlled" town hall meeting on health care. During that forum, Obama "coincidentally" called on three people (out of 200) who work with groups trying to pass his health care proposal.
-Obama is so intent on bullying our ally Israel that he is breaching a previous Bush administration-negotiated agreement between Israel and the United States to allow some Israeli construction in West Bank settlements to allow for natural growth.
- The Obama-Holder Justice Department dismissed a strong case against New Black Panther Party members for billy club-style voter intimidation because the members were intimidating for Obama's election.
- Obama and Holder are going to vacate an order of prior Attorney General Michael Mukasey's stating that immigrants facing deportation do not have an automatic right to an effective lawyer.
Obama and Holder are now mirandizing terrorists on the battlefield.
- Some have questioned whether Obama-Holder ordered the FBI to "back off" anti-terror investigations of radicalized Muslim converts, such as the one who police say shot two military recruiters in Little Rock, Ark.
- Obama's auto task force used "intimidation tactics" against Chrysler's senior bondholders and called their Democratic lawyer, Tom Lauria, a "terrorist" for refusing to accept its offer outright. Where, by the way, were Leahy and Feingold — and all the liberal media — when Obama's deal involved an executive-forced transfer of ownership from shareholders and creditors to Obama's favored unions? Were they also unbothered by claims of Chrysler dealers that they were threatened and lied to?
- Obama's thugs fired AmeriCorps inspector general Gerald Walpin and slandered him as virtually demented because he blew the whistle on the corrupt practices of Obama's buddies.
To say this is scratching the surface is a monumental exaggeration.
Pinko
"Today these same senators are not just passively mute about Obama's power grabs; they are co-conspirators."
They are also trying to remove the term limit provision, so King Barack can remain in power indefinitely. The next step will be to remove any competition.
1It is truely incredible and oh-so alarming. This has all been done in 6 months. Think of what he will have done by the end of 4 years. Wake up people!
2Well that's the first time I have heard that one.
Where is it written that "They are also trying to remove the term limit provision, so King Barack can remain in power indefinitely." Where is that article or interview?
3In January, a Democratic Senator wrote a bill that would repeal the amendment that a President could only serve two terms. I'm looking for it, and will Post it when I find it.
4http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=hj111-5
5***************
"I will marshal all the forces of darkness to hound you to an assisted suicide." - In the Loop
I thought it came from good old Shumer but alas no, it was Serrano. What is with my senators?
6***************
"I will marshal all the forces of darkness to hound you to an assisted suicide." - In the Loop
Thanks. I was just getting around to posting the link I foind, but yours is better.
7you are welcome. found it through the voice magazine.
8http://www.thevoicemagazine.com/move-to-repeal-presidential-term-limits-...
***************
"I will marshal all the forces of darkness to hound you to an assisted suicide." - In the Loop
We can only pray that the majority of American's wake up and do not vote this man a second term let alone a life term. Unless somehow our freedom to vote is removed as well. Of course, if you make people dependent on the government it isn't too likely they will vote you out.
9Just so we can get the full story...
From factcheck.org:
"A bill that proposes repealing the 22nd Amendment has been introduced, but so far it has very little support.
It's true that New York Rep. Jose Serrano, a Democrat, introduced a bill (H.J.RES.5) on Jan. 6, when Congress opened, proposing the repeal of the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which limits presidents to two terms. Repealing that amendment would require ratification by three-fourths of the states.
The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties and is sitting there now. It has no cosponsors. ( as of June 18, 2009 )
Serrano introduced or cosponsored the same proposal in 1997 and 1999, when Democrat Bill Clinton was president, and again in 2001 just days before Republican George Bush was sworn in for his first term. He also introduced it in 2003, 2005 and 2007, all before Barack Obama even announced he was running for president.
All of these bills died in committee without ever coming to a vote. None of Serrano's bills attracted any cosponsors, except for the 1997 and 1999 versions, each of which was cosponsored by Rep. Chris Shays of Connecticut, a Republican."
So it's not like Obama is spearheading this movement...
10Lazy, you have to wonder if people aren't getting a clearer indication of just who this man is and what he is capable of right about now... Or are they still living in their own little fishbowl? It's freakin' scary.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
11"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Thomas Jefferson
Well, Blue and to others who might be interested, check out this website. http://www.end22.com/
12It is clear why they want this bill passed and why it has gained muster.
Has it really "gained muster" though? I'm honestly curious. I've seen multiple postings and mumblings round here about a repeal and it looks more like the same dude introducing the bill for the zillionth time.
13I agree Sarah that right now it appears that the bill to repeal the 22nd amendment is going nowhere. But I will still keep my eye on it now that the Democrats control both the house and the senate.
How do you feel about some of the other issues raised? Honestly, I had much higher hopes for transparency back in November after Obama was elected. But we have not had the time to read bills before they were signed as promised. The recovery.gov website doesn't tell you much about how money has been spent and even says reporting for who received stimulus money won't begin until October of this year.
14Weather or not the bill has gone anywhere isn't the issue. It's the fact that the dems are putting it out there and testing the water.
15I am a little nervous...Obama is starting to mimic a certain H I T L E R person...controlling media conferences...taking over industry...putting friendly people in high places that are merely puppets or cheerleaders...taking control over banks($)...firing people that have opposing views...it is starting to look just a little TOO much like history repeating itself. There is an erie silence which gives me pause...too many are simply looking another direction or are blinded by this man's false halo.
16G*d help us all.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
17"If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under." Ronald Reagan
And how sad is it that I had to put an "*" in there... I almost disappoint myself. I'd rather be flagged.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
18"If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under." Ronald Reagan
BTW...I am writing legislation with The American Legion and it is a complicated process. It is not unusual for a piece of legislation to be tossed out for a minor issue such as poor format, a grammatical error...or it was not received within the correct due date/time. The "language" used in legislation is entirely different matter and it is more complicated than you will believe.
The frustrating thing is you may send it and it may be perfect BUT if it isn't properly processed it gets kicked back again to go thru the whole process all over again. I have come to believe that it is this complicated on purpose, proverbial red tape, to discourage the little guy with little means to push legislation thru.
The fact that this man/group has managed to get it all the way thru to that point is almost miraculous.
I also believe that the process is so convoluted to encourage "tag-on" legislation which is stuck onto legislation that is not even pertinent, hence little things get passed by sneaking thru the process and then become BIG things after it was passed. It leaves us all scratching our heads and wondering "Where did THAT come from?"
19Cheeky, that is a good point about the system. Maybe we need to introduce legislation that would make it more straight-forward to submit a bill.
20*bluesarahlou* was right in their first comment on here. This has been proposed more than once during other presidential terms as well. It did not first appear with President Obama, he's not pushing or "superheading" to pass this. And most likely it will be introduce during the next Presidents term.
And President Obama is nowhere near like the Iran President/Dictator anyway, and any sane person knows that one. President Obama cannot fix everyone’s problems within his first 6 months in office. And try to remember that it was George Bush that put the economy in a HOLE with all the many stupid moves he's done over 8 years time.
When it comes to ideas...Things will probably look bad before they begin to get better for the American people. That’s usually how it goes when it comes to bad situations like our economy.
Oh, and...."Were such an amendment to be passed by two thirds of both Houses of Congress (which it would probably not be), and three quarters of all State Legislatures (which it also probably wouldn't be), it wouldn't take effect until after Obama was out of office."
This is the United States Of America and this is the kind of Bill that will never pass no matter how many times this man presents it to be passed.
21This Bill idea is nothing to stress over.
22President Obama cannot fix everyone’s problems within his first 6 months in office.
Thing is, I don't want him even trying to fix my problems. That's not his job.
23
24Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.